Home News Teenager Earns Vast Fortune with Inventive Gaming Venture

Teenager Earns Vast Fortune with Inventive Gaming Venture

by Violet Jan 26,2025

Teenager Earns Vast Fortune with Inventive Gaming Venture

Monopoly GO's Microtransaction Problem: A $25,000 Case Study

A recent incident highlights the significant financial risks associated with in-app purchases, specifically within the mobile game Monopoly GO. A 17-year-old reportedly spent a staggering $25,000 on in-game purchases, underscoring the potential for uncontrolled spending and the challenges of obtaining refunds.

This isn't an isolated case. Numerous players have confessed to substantial in-game spending in Monopoly GO, with one user reporting a $1,000 expenditure before uninstalling the app. The $25,000 incident, detailed in a since-deleted Reddit post, involved 368 separate transactions made via the App Store. The stepparent's subsequent search for recourse revealed a disheartening truth: the game's terms of service often hold users responsible for all purchases, regardless of intent.

The Controversy Surrounding In-Game Microtransactions

The Monopoly GO situation adds to the ongoing debate surrounding in-game microtransactions. The practice has faced considerable criticism, with lawsuits filed against major gaming companies like Take-Two Interactive (regarding NBA 2K) over their microtransaction models. While this specific Monopoly GO case is unlikely to result in litigation, it serves as a stark reminder of the potential for financial harm.

The profitability of microtransactions is undeniable; games like Diablo 4 have generated over $150 million in revenue from these purchases. The strategy's effectiveness lies in its ability to incentivize smaller, incremental spending, often leading to significantly higher overall expenditure than a single, equivalent purchase. This very characteristic, however, is a source of contention among gamers, who often perceive microtransaction models as deceptive and manipulative.

The Reddit user's predicament underscores the difficulty of securing refunds for unintentional in-app purchases. The incident serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the ease with which significant sums can be spent in games employing microtransaction models like Monopoly GO.

Latest Articles More+
  • 11 2026-01
    Krafton Defends inZOI Sales Amid Low Steam Stats

    Krafton, the publisher behind inZOI, has responded to ongoing discussions about its declining Steam concurrent player numbers. The company emphasizes that as a single-player title, sales figures offer a more accurate measure of success.The visually s

  • 11 2026-01
    Creating Happy Citizens in a Brand-New Town

    Take on the role of the city's new mayor and build your dream metropolisGuide your citizens' professional paths and help them thrive in their careersNow available for pre-registration on Google PlayLifeSim has officially opened pre-registration for H

  • 10 2026-01
    Oblivion Outshines Skyrim in Lasting Impact

    View 6 ImagesAsk longtime gamers about the Xbox 360 era, and beyond the notorious Red Ring of Death, you'll hear countless nostalgic memories—many of them tied to The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. As a former Official Xbox Magazine editor, I'll never f